Short answer
Buying authority sits with whoever can commit the company's money to a purchase of your size: usually the budget owner for the problem, within a spending limit the company sets, with finance, procurement, legal or IT able to block. No data platform shows it directly; they show titles, seniority and reporting lines. Confirm it from public records, such as officer lists, company registers and published purchasing thresholds, and by asking how a purchase this size gets approved.
- Authority is a limit, not a title: the same VP may approve $40,000 alone and need the CFO at $150,000.
- Data platforms infer decision makers from titles; your CRM's buying-role field is where real authority gets recorded, by you.
- Public records show formal authority: SEC officer lists and 8-Ks, Companies House officers, German Prokura in the commercial register.
- In US federal buying, only contracting officers sign contracts; the micro-purchase threshold is $15,000 (FAR, effective 13 March 2026).
- Test your data: compare who your platform suggested with who actually signed your last 20 deals.
On this page
- Authority is a limit, not a title
- Which platforms show who has buying authority?
- Formal authority in public records
- Buying authority in the public sector
- Signs someone holds authority, and signs they don't
- Questions that reveal authority without asking "are you the decision maker?"
- A test: how often does your data pick the right person?
- Worked example: a $60,000 deal at a manufacturer
- Common mistakes
- Sources
- Questions people ask
This guide is for SDRs, account executives and founders who keep reaching people who like the idea but can't approve it. It explains the kinds of authority inside a company, which platforms and public records show any of it, the questions that reveal it without asking "are you the decision maker?", and a test of how often your data picks the right person. For mapping everyone involved in a deal, see how to find decision makers; for the definition and history of the term, see economic buyer.
Authority is a limit, not a title
Most companies past a few dozen people write down who may approve spending of what size, often called a delegation of authority or an approval matrix. Three kinds of authority are worth separating:
| Kind | What it means | Typical holder |
|---|---|---|
| Budget authority | Owns the budget line the purchase comes from | The head of the function with the problem |
| Approval authority | May approve spending up to a set amount | Managers, directors and VPs, each with a limit |
| Signing authority | May legally bind the company to a contract | Officers, directors and people with a formal power of attorney |
| Veto | Can stop a purchase they don't own | Finance, procurement, legal, IT security |
The person you want is the one whose approval limit covers your deal and whose budget pays for it, the economic buyer in MEDDIC terms. Bigger deals move that person up the organization.
Illustrative approval matrix. Real limits vary widely; ask for the company's own.
| Annual contract value | Who approves | Also required |
|---|---|---|
| Up to $10,000 | Budget holder in the department | Purchase order or company card |
| $10,000 to $50,000 | Director or VP of the function | Procurement setup for a new supplier |
| $50,000 to $250,000 | VP plus finance | IT security review for software; legal for non-standard terms |
| Over $250,000 | CEO or executive committee | Board approval for some multi-year commitments |
Category rules cut across amounts. Software usually needs an IT security review whatever it costs, and new suppliers often need procurement setup even for small purchases.
Which platforms show who has buying authority?
None show it directly. Sales data platforms show who holds which title, and some let you draw who matters; public records show formal legal authority at the top. We checked each source's own pages on 30 October 2026.
| Source | What it shows | What it doesn't show |
|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn Sales Navigator | Relationship Map, which LinkedIn describes as "a visual map of the key decision makers at your accounts", built by drag and drop on all licenses (November 2023 update); Account IQ AI account summaries on Advanced and Advanced Plus | Spending limits, or who signs |
| Apollo | People search by seniority, inferred from the current job title: owner, founder, C-suite, partner, VP, head, director, manager, senior, entry, intern | Its People API search has no decision-maker or authority parameter |
| HubSpot CRM | A default "Buying role" contact property; a contact can hold more than one role | It's what your team records, not data the CRM finds |
| SEC filings (US public companies) | Executive officers and their positions (Regulation S-K Item 401); changes in senior officers on Form 8-K Item 5.02 | Authority below the top team |
| UK Companies House | Current and past officers of every UK company | Who controls a given budget |
| German commercial register | Managing directors and Prokuristen, including whether Prokura is joint | Internal approval limits |
| US federal acquisition rules | Who may sign and the purchase thresholds | Individual names |
So when a tool labels someone a "decision maker", it is usually inferring from title and seniority. Treat that as a starting hypothesis, then confirm it with the questions below.
Formal authority in public records
- US public companies. The 10-K or proxy lists executive officers and how long they've held each role. An 8-K under Item 5.02 reports when a chief executive, chief financial officer, chief operating officer or similar officer leaves or is appointed, which often resets who approves what. Finding officers is the easy part; the enterprise account research guide shows how to find the business unit below them that owns your problem.
- UK companies. Companies House lists directors. At a small company, a director is often the buyer; at a large one, directors rarely sign supplier contracts themselves.
- German companies. The register shows managing directors (Geschäftsführer) and Prokuristen. Under the Commercial Code, Prokura authorizes every kind of transaction that running the business involves, except selling or mortgaging land without a specific grant, and joint Prokura must be registered as such. A Prokurist in finance or purchasing can often sign your contract; see finding decision makers in Europe.
Buying authority in the public sector
Government buyers publish their rules. In US federal buying, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (effective 13 March 2026) says contracts "may be entered into and signed on behalf of the Government only by contracting officers." It sets the micro-purchase threshold at $15,000 and the simplified acquisition threshold at $350,000, with exceptions. For micro-purchases, agency heads are encouraged to delegate authority to trained purchasers, and the government purchase card is the preferred method. In practice, a program manager can champion a purchase, but below $15,000 a card holder may be able to buy, and above it a contracting officer signs. State and local governments publish their own thresholds; find them in the purchasing or procurement section of the agency's website.
Signs someone holds authority, and signs they don't
| What you hear | What it suggests | How to check |
|---|---|---|
| "It's in my budget for this year" | Budget authority | "Is there a line for this, or would it need new money?" |
| They describe the approval steps unprompted | Close to the decision | "Who signs at the end of that?" |
| "When we bought X last year, I..." | Has bought in the category | "Who else reviewed that purchase?" |
| Every cost question is deferred | Influencer, not owner | "Whose budget would this come from?" |
| A senior title in a different function | A possible approver or blocker, not the owner | "How involved would you be if your team took this on?" |
Questions that reveal authority without asking "are you the decision maker?"
That question invites a yes from almost everyone. These get you the path instead:
- "How does a purchase like this usually get approved here?"
- "Above what amount does this need someone else's sign-off?"
- "Whose budget would this come from?"
- "The last time you bought something in this category, who signed, and who else reviewed it?"
- "Who could stop this, even if you and your team wanted it?"
- "What does procurement need from a new supplier?"
- "If we agree this is worth doing, what happens between now and a signature?"
Record the answers in your CRM's buying-role field against each contact, with the date and who told you. The BANT questions page has more authority and budget questions in the order to ask them.
A test: how often does your data pick the right person?
Run this on your own closed deals to see how far to trust a platform's "decision maker".
- Pull your last 20 closed-won deals. From the contract and the CRM, record who signed, who owned the budget and who could have blocked it.
- Look up each account in your data platform and note the people it ranks highest or tags as decision makers for your product's function.
- Score each deal: did the platform's top suggestion match the signer, the budget owner, either, or neither? Was the signer in the platform at all?
- Repeat for 10 lost deals where you know, from the debrief, who decided.
- Read the result. If the top suggestion matches the budget owner in fewer than half of deals, use the platform to find names and your questions to find authority.
Deal: [account] Size: $[ ] Closed: [date] Won / Lost FROM THE CONTRACT AND CRM Signer: [role] Budget owner: [role] Blockers: [roles] FROM THE DATA PLATFORM Top suggested contact for our function: [role] Tagged "decision maker": [roles] Signer listed in the platform at all? Y / N MATCH Top suggestion = signer? Y / N Top suggestion = budget owner? Y / N Notes: [e.g. platform suggested the CFO; a VP signed within her limit]
Worked example: a $60,000 deal at a manufacturer
Illustrative example. The companies, people and limits are invented to show the method.
The seller: a maintenance software company. The account: Fernvale Components (fernvale.example), a 900-person manufacturer. The deal: $60,000 a year.
What the data platform suggested: the CEO and the CFO, the two most senior people, both tagged as decision makers.
What three conversations revealed:
| Person | Role in this deal | How the seller learned it |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance manager | Champion; owns the problem | Discovery call: "I lose two days a month to unplanned stops" |
| VP Operations | Budget owner and economic buyer; approves up to $100,000 | The champion: "anything over $25,000 goes to my VP" |
| CFO | Not involved below $100,000 | The VP: "finance only sees it above my limit" |
| IT security lead | Can block any software purchase | The VP: "IT has to sign off on anything that touches the network" |
| Procurement | Needs supplier setup and standard terms | Procurement portal on the company's website |
What changed: the seller dropped the CEO and CFO from the sequence, asked the champion to introduce the VP Operations with a one-page summary of downtime costs, and sent the security documentation to IT before the VP meeting. The deal needed four people's support, and none of them was the person the platform ranked first.
At volume, finding the right roles at each account is the slow part; Bebop finds companies and contacts that match your description and writes a playbook for each account, including who to talk to. Confirm authority the same way, with the questions above.
Common mistakes
- Equating seniority with authority. The CEO of a 900-person company rarely approves a $60,000 tool.
- Taking "I'm the decision maker" at face value. Ask about the approval path instead.
- Ignoring vetoes. IT security, legal and procurement can't buy, but they can stop.
- Forgetting that authority moves. A new CFO or a reorganization resets limits; watch 8-Ks and announcements.
- Not writing it down. Authority you learned on a call and didn't record is lost when the deal changes hands.
Next step: qualify authority alongside need, timing and budget with the BANT questions.
Sources
- Check out the latest features and enhancements in Q4 2023: visualize your relationship with decision makers at an account, LinkedIn Sales Navigator Community, 15 November 2023
- People API Search, Apollo.io, accessed 30 October 2026
- HubSpot's default contact properties, HubSpot Knowledge Base, updated 21 September 2026, accessed 30 October 2026
- 17 CFR 229.401 (Regulation S-K Item 401), Directors, executive officers, promoters and control persons, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, accessed 30 October 2026
- Form 8-K, General Instructions (Item 5.02), US Securities and Exchange Commission, accessed 30 October 2026
- Find and update company information, Companies House, accessed 30 October 2026
- Handelsgesetzbuch (HGB), § 49 Umfang der Prokura, Bundesministerium der Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de), accessed 30 October 2026
- Handelsgesetzbuch (HGB), § 53 Anmeldung der Prokura, Bundesministerium der Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de), accessed 30 October 2026
- FAR 2.101, Definitions (micro-purchase and simplified acquisition thresholds), Acquisition.gov, effective 13 March 2026
- FAR 1.601, General (contracting authority), Acquisition.gov, effective 13 March 2026
- FAR 13.201, General (micro-purchases), Acquisition.gov, effective 13 March 2026
Written by the Bebop team at Blackpearl Group. Published .
Questions people ask
Who has buying authority in a company?
The person whose budget pays for the purchase and whose approval limit covers its size, usually the head of the function with the problem. Larger purchases need more senior or additional approval, often finance. Procurement, legal and IT security can block without owning the budget. The exact limits sit in the company's delegation of authority, so ask how a purchase your size gets approved.
How do you find the decision maker in a company?
Start with the problem you solve and the budget it comes from, then use the company's size to guess which role owns that budget. Find candidates on the leadership page, LinkedIn and public records, then confirm with questions: how purchases like this get approved, whose budget it comes from, and who signed the last similar purchase. Record what you learn against each contact.
What is an economic buyer?
The economic buyer is the person who gives final approval for a purchase and releases the money for it, and who can stop the deal even when everyone else wants it. Qualification frameworks such as MEDDIC make identifying the economic buyer a core step. Who holds the role depends on deal size: the bigger the purchase, the higher in the organization it sits.
Which platforms show who has buying authority in a company?
None show it directly. Sales data platforms such as Apollo infer seniority from job titles, and LinkedIn Sales Navigator lets you build a map of key decision makers yourself. CRMs such as HubSpot have a buying-role field your team fills in. Public records show formal authority at the top: SEC filings for US public companies, Companies House officers in the UK, and managing directors and Prokuristen in Germany's commercial register.
How do you ask a prospect if they have buying authority?
Ask about the process rather than the person. Good questions are: how does a purchase like this usually get approved here, above what amount does it need someone else's sign-off, whose budget would it come from, and who signed the last similar purchase. These get honest, specific answers, while asking someone whether they're the decision maker usually just gets a yes.